Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage

Essay topics:

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage.

The golden frog that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama is severely endangered by a fungus, which inhibits thefrog's life functions. Conservationists have proposed three solutions to the problem, but the lecturer says none of the solutionswill be effective to solve the problem.
First, it is proposed that a type of bacterium may be introduced to the skin of the golden frogs to kill fungal cells. However, theprofessor says that the bacterium did not last long after introduction to frog skin, and therefore the protection was only temporary.Also, the bacterium only produces the chemical that kills the fungal cell in the early stage of its colonization. The bacterium nolonger produces the chemical shortly after that initial stage and the protection stops.
Second, it is proposed to breed the golden frog in captivity and then release these fungus-free frogs to the wild to supplementfrog population. However, the professor says the released fungus-free frogs will not stay healthy once they are released to thewild because other animals living in the wild also carry the same fungus. The newly released frogs will get infected quickly oncethey come into contact with the fungus-carrying animals.
Third, the reading passage suggests that some golden frogs increase their body temperature after infection. If this naturaldefense spreads to the entire frog population, then crisis can be overcome. However, the professor challenges this by pointingout a big problem. In order to raise the body temperature, frogs have to expend a lot of energy and they are weakened as aresult.Weakened frogs can get sick easily or die for other reasons. They might be protected from the fungus but they are notstrong and healthy anymore.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...efore the protection was only temporary.Also, the bacterium only produces the chemic...
^^^^
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Weakened
...energy and they are weakened as aresult.Weakened frogs can get sick easily or die for ot...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30797101449 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9941898333 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56884057971 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5903051182 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100209590295 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418362765233 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047578204861 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648460130265 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371087104696 0.0443174109184 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.