Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage.
The reading passage and the lecture discuss the theories of how the Chaco Canyon buildings were used. The author states that there could be three explanations of settlements being a residenсe, a storage or a ceremonial centre. The lecture disagrees with each point made in the reading and suggests that despite the logical speculations, there are some dissonances, which make the theories fake.
First of all, the reading passage argues that Chaco structures were built for housing people as they were similar to apartment buildings at Taos. However, the speaker contends that the inside of the accommodation was different and contained few fireplaces, when warmth played a big role in a residence.
Secondly, it is claimed that the building was suitable for storing grain maize because corn does not spoil for long time. The lecturer undermines this point by mentioning that there is no real evidence for supply storage. If it was a warehouse, there would be some traces and containers.
Finally, the article says that mound, formed by discarded pots, shows the ceremonial purpose of the house. In the lecture, the professor disproves this theory by saying that sand, stones, construction tools were also found there and as they are not ritual things, the Chaco structure was most likely to be a garbage storage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...enсe, a storage or a ceremonial centre. The lecture disagrees with each point made ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15813953488 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67264248404 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6787413768 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230326271139 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858582025474 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877309447677 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127990803272 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108323980982 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.