Summarize the main points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage.
According to the reading passage, the reason for the rapid decline of sea otters near Aaskan coast is due to the environmental pollution and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor suggests that the predation hypothesis is more convincing and refutes each of the author’s points by providing the reasons.
First of all, the professor argues that no one can really find any dead sea otters near the Alaskan coast which means that otter have been eaten by predators thats why otters population is rapidly declined.This contradicts the reading which claims that oil rigs and industrial chemicals created pollution in the water and otters couldn't resist infectious diseases due to this pollution and died.
Second, the professor contends that Orcas like to eat big whales and these whales disappear near the Alaskan coast because of human hunting. Now, Orcas started eating small mammals like seals and sea lions. That's why other smaller sea animals have also disappeared in that area not because of pollution as reading claimed.
Finally, the professor states that because of their bigger size Orcas cannot reach to the shallow and rocky location and in those areas sea otters population is not declined and other easily reachable areas have rapid decline of sea otters. This opposes the reading which claims that uneven pattern of sea otters decline in different Alaskan location is because some areas are more polluted than the others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more convincing and refutes each of the author’s points by providing the reasons...
^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...that otter have been eaten by predators thats why otters population is rapidly declin...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...y otters population is rapidly declined.This contradicts the reading which claims th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...eated pollution in the water and otters couldnt resist infectious diseases due to this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 209, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...small mammals like seals and sea lions. Thats why other smaller sea animals have also...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...d rocky location and in those areas sea otters population is not declined and other ea...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, really, second, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26808510638 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40843545481 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.5704948154 49.2860985944 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.75 110.228320801 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0325180613156 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0178554896722 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0149893822881 0.0662205650399 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0227211552548 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113804403567 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.