Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the nuclear power plant. The author of the reading states that it has adversely affecting the environment so utilization of this source must be limit and instead use other possible alternatives such as wind, solar energy and so on. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the idea and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that merely small fraction of nuclear power are being used and other are toxic that has harmful impact on ambiance. In addition there are no ways to eradicate it rather than preserving it. Owing to this, our future generation are going to suffer it’s effects. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends although it has cause few problem however other electricity sources such as solar and wind are also detrimental to the environment. Furthermore, there has been evidence of death caused by the harmful chemical emitted by these sources.
Secondly, according to the writing, wastes generated from nuclear energy have repercussions to the environment. Likewise, it can cost to the death of people as well. Moreover, disaster to the Fukushima has proved nuclear power to be hazardous. The speaker on other hand points out that, unwanted substances from nuclear is not permanent since there are numerous measures introduced in order to manage these wastes. Indeed, some of them are found to be promising as well.
Finally, the reading passage also suggest for the usuage of renewable sources such as solar power and wind power instead. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that they are not worth it because they cannot provide constant electricity. For instance, if there is no enough wind then how could wind power supply electricity? Therefore, they are not worth it.
All things considered, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on nuclear power plant. The speaker effectively challenges writer’s argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s such as wind, solar energy and so on. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the idea...
^^^
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...First, the author begins by stating that merely small fraction of nuclear power a...
^^
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...that has harmful impact on ambiance. In addition there are no ways to eradicate it rathe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: TO_VB_ITS_NN[26]
Message: Did you mean 'to suffer its effects'?
Suggestion: to suffer its effects
...o this, our future generation are going to suffer it’s effects. The professor believes there are flaws...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...r future generation are going to suffer it’s effects. The professor believes there a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'few problems'.
Suggestion: few problems
...tion. He contends although it has cause few problem however other electricity sources such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...stes. Indeed, some of them are found to be promising as well. Finally, the reading passage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1801242236 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64507318905 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3335890651 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8181818182 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6363636364 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 4.45695364238 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130548102566 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338541293528 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327574197952 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659078253295 0.162205337803 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432327108118 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.