Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading is about the art movement called Pre Raphaelite brotherhood which was criticized because of the fascination in medieval culture as well as depiction of religious theme. The lecturer agrees with the idea and supports each of the concept mentioned in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that Pre Raphaelite at the time was considered as archaic in art. However, the brotherhood believed medieval culture held unique spiritual truth that faded over the course of time. The lecture corroborates Pre Raphaelite school was criticized because of it’s composition, sharp focus and absence of shadow.
Secondly, according to the article realism stressed the independent observation of nature yet Pre Raphaelite was keen on close observation of nature. The professor mentions, the landscape painting of Ruskin, accuracy of plant and it’s minute details attracted Pre Raphaelite . Furthermore, he held the believe that artist must be true to nature and rendered to what was seen and understood imaginatively on the canvas. These ideas affected the Pre Raphaelite and in return gained the appreciation for Ruskin.
Finally, the Pre Raphaelite brotherhood dissolved yet some of them remained close friends and collaborated for the renewal of brotherhood. The professor mentions that the journey of Willian Holman to near east provided the aid for the expansion of Pre Raphaelite precepts and was described on the painting “The escape boat”.
As we can see how the author and lecturer supports each other’s points in article and lecture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: ABOUT_ITS_NN[25]
Message: Did you mean 'of its composition'?
Suggestion: of its composition
...aphaelite school was criticized because of it’s composition, sharp focus and absence of shadow. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because of it’s composition, sharp focus and absence of shadow. Secondly, accord...
^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...condly, according to the article realism stressed the independent observation of ...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... minute details attracted Pre Raphaelite . Furthermore, he held the believe that a...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d Pre Raphaelite . Furthermore, he held the believe that artist must be true to nature and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...e Raphaelite . Furthermore, he held the believe that artist must be true to nature and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44855967078 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8994851687 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576131687243 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5378960758 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0527273998853 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232275621983 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413913798852 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452605110071 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549577482961 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.