Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about right to vote. The author of the reading state that it shoud be made mandatory for every citizen to vote in order to form democracy. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions it depends on the person whether they want to vote or not and attacks each of the claims made in the article. First, the author begins by stating that compulsion for voting offer people an opportunity to numerous people in making strong democracy because of the huge number of votes. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that what if they do not like any of the candidate? Nevertheless, if they are compelled to vote then this will made their right unethical. Secondly, according to the writing, there is plummeting in voter's participation. Additionally, the day is not so far when there would be only members of the candidates at the poll. Thus, making it compulsory to vote ensures majority of people participates in voting. Infact, this is what the true democracy wants. The speaker on other hand points out that concluding few voters as bad question the legitimacy because if they are forced to vote amid two candidates which they do not like either then this would form a artificial law. Finally, the reading passage also notes that there is a right of freedom in US. In addition, government work for people and people regulate the government however if they enforced the system of voting to be mandatory then elected official could claim greater legitimacy. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that some people might not have interest and do not care about the politics. Furthermore, if they are forced to vote despite of ill information then it will directly affect the electrol process. As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on right to vote. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...zen to vote in order to form democracy. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions it depe...
^^^
Line 1, column 680, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ey are compelled to vote then this will made their right unethical. Secondly, accord...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...do not like either then this would form a artificial law. Finally, the reading pa...
^
Line 1, column 1886, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89164086687 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64587267252 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53560371517 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6510573906 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159595442862 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462464369444 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465783105106 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159595442862 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.