Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about how critical is it to need subisides for energy source like fossil fuel? The author of the reading state that although this ensures the economic development of nation, many seem to question it's effectiveness. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the idea and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that minimum global cost does not guaranteed just because government offering subsides. For instance, there has been evidence of increment in price from $2 to $5 within one year despite providing subsides. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that US economy highly depend on the transportation of goods through truck,train and so on within and out the nation. Thus, granting subsides is imperative for them so as to lower the price.
Secondly, according to the writing, subsides are meant to be accord to those who are in need to bolster their industry so as to prevent them from falling. However, mostly the companies that are already in huge profit are acquiring subsides. Therefore, this proves that subsides are not assisting the needy company. The speaker on other hand points out that subsides play significant role in sustaining as well as promoting the growth of a company.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that even though it is believed to be plummeting in oil price with the presence of subsides. Yet, this has never happened till date. In addition, oil companies are susceptible to set prices keeping fuels affordable. Furthermore, with such massive profit instead of sticking to the cost , they lower their profit margin.The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that subside create employment opportunity as they need man power in corporation in exploration and refining the oil thus flourish the economic growth.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on government subsidy. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...any seem to question its effectiveness. The lecturer disagrees. He opposes the idea...
^^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'guarantee'
Suggestion: guarantee
...ating that minimum global cost does not guaranteed just because government offering subsid...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...been evidence of increment in price from to within one year despite providing su...
^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evidence of increment in price from to within one year despite providing subsid...
^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , train
...he transportation of goods through truck,train and so on within and out the nation. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 480, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ranting subsides is imperative for them so as to lower the price. Secondly, according ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...o are in need to bolster their industry so as to prevent them from falling. However, mos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e profit instead of sticking to the cost , they lower their profit margin.The prof...
^^
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...e cost , they lower their profit margin.The professor rebuts this argument. He puts...
^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19692307692 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72515068103 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593846153846 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3096362232 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.45 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116213433854 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293643703225 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366080920658 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576207922544 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480581595068 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.