Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecturer are both about how the human brain is impacted by intelligence. The author of the reading states that there are other contributing factors along with the size of certain structure that affect intelligence. The lecturer agrees. He accepts the ideas and supports each of the claims made in the article. First, the author begins by stating that quality of tissue plays a vital role in determining the intelligence of a person. In addition, neutral connections, metabolic efficiency ensures the smooth transmitting of information within brain cells. The professor believes there are truth in writer's position. He elaborates that with the research of Einstein's brain it is concluded that cerebral cortex right behind the face differs from person to person. Thus, intricacy of Einstein's part showed his level of smartness.
Secondly, undoubtedly the brain size matters, it can be found in primates who exhibit larger brain and it is directly connected with the demand of living. The speaker on other hand mentions that it is highly specialize the human thinking such as planning things, executing it as well as worrying about the future. Furthermore, human brain is complex in nature so the complexity determines the intelligence. Finally, the reading passage also notes that cortical convolution affect the intelligence which is also referr0ed as folding of brain surface. Moreover, larger the surface greater the degree of intelligence. The professor agrees with this statement. de puts forth the idea that sensory and motor cortex are responsible for the smartness. Additionally,it expands in a 0rectangular parch in left hemisphere that reveals the person's intelligence.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds similar views on the factors that confirms human's intelligence. The speaker effectively supports the writer's concept.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ain structure that affect intelligence. The lecturer agrees. He accepts the ideas a...
^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'specialized'.
Suggestion: specialized
...n other hand mentions that it is highly specialize the human thinking such as planning thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 657, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: De
...e professor agrees with this statement. de puts forth the idea that sensory and mo...
^^
Line 2, column 757, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ponsible for the smartness. Additionally,it expands in a 0rectangular parch in left...
^^^
Line 2, column 829, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...rch in left hemisphere that reveals the persons intelligence. As we can see, the autho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...e. The speaker effectively supports the writers concept.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43598615917 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94851922832 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7519316069 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6842105263 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 4.33554083885 392% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756703126981 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241753791694 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383843073013 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0482868322802 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251905984123 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.68 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.