Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the right to have access to internet. The author of the reading states that every single citizen must have the availability of internet as their lives are circled around the fashion of internet. The lecturer disagrees the idea and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
Firstly, the author begins by stating that this will have numerous benefit to society. For instance, internet on business creates job opportunities, support entrepreneurship and so on. Similarly, people can obtain varieties of educational information. Furthermore, politician can raice voice through the various platform offered by internet and thus have transparency with officials. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that indeed it accord lavish life with entertainment, they are not crucial for living. Moreover, prior to the invention of internet, people used to have successful and productive life.
Secondly, according to the reading, internet should be provided to all along with the other human rights such as food, shelter and clothes. They can have right to free speech, religion, education and so on with the id of internet. The speaker, on other hand points out that government can neither confer access nor restrict it. The only thing they can do is provide opportunity for library yet they can limit the access to this as well. Thus, this is something to be taken seriously because why would government limit the access if internet is a right?
Finally, the reading passage also notes that global access of internet for broad connection, infrastructures, and so on is essential. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that they might not enjoy the facility owing to the unavailability of means to operate it. Moreover, it needs a huge sum to install infrastructure which is not worth to expend it.
As we can see the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on making internet access a right. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
Votes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...circled around the fashion of internet. The lecturer disagrees the idea and attacks...
^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accords'?
Suggestion: accords
...rs position. He contends that indeed it accord lavish life with entertainment, they ar...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding, internet should be provided to all along with the other human rights such a...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...long with the other human rights such as food, shelter and clothes. They can have...
^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thing they can do is provide opportunity for library yet they can limit the acces...
^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument. Votes
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21921921922 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85231542275 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573573573574 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5516598276 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.7619047619 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104273751222 0.272083759551 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300499179133 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352475370599 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05839978643 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373663592484 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.