Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture re both about the elevating trend on eco tourism in which tourist go into the woods and observe the scenario there. The author of the reading states that although they obtain certain experience nad insight, they are likely to degrade the surroundings. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions that eco tourism is the best way to flourish nation and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that even though ecologist are careful to great extent, they end up doing harm as soon as they step in wild knowingly or unknowingly. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that indeed they do impact the environment yet there are in minimal amount not the harsh one.
Secondly, according to the writing, not only the natural landscape or plant life is degraded they do threat the wildlife species too invading in ambiance. For instance, polar beer in Artic are found to be affected by tourist while they are hibernating. They are prompt to distract waking or frightening them as they are sleeping or conserving energy. The speaker, on other hand points out that eco tourism is beneficial in preserving flora and fauna of host country. For example, whale watching rather than killing them protects them in environment.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that they devastate the habitat since they are susceptible to bare space for picnic, leaving eclectric wire that are used to power their camp and so on. These activities has seriously affected the natural habitat in a harsh manner. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that numerous developing nation are inclined towards deforestation for making their land profitable yet focusing on eco tourism will definitely aid them to make proper use of land in a more sustainable way.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on advantage of eco tourism. The speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...are likely to degrade the surroundings. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions that ec...
^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... their camp and so on. These activities has seriously affected the natural habitat ...
^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harsh manner" with adverb for "harsh"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... seriously affected the natural habitat in a harsh manner. The professor rebuts this argument. He...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 132, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... The speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05438066465 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6111843823 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 145.348785872 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610271903323 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9976554552 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9444444444 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158293576811 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427089382291 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355558194039 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754396465518 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401322725839 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.