Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the free trade that are likely to flourish economy of any nation. Th author of the reading states that, this is beneficial to elevate in nation's income. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions that government should rather focus on fair trade than on free trade and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that, this will open door to international market encouraging foreign direct investment and thus aid in enhancing country's economy. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer's position. He contends that, even though this seems beneficial yet this should not be at the expense of labor and environment. Furthermore, this accord pressure on country for social and environmental regulation.
Secondly, according to the writing, owing to the world trade organization rule, this has granted special right to nation like sub-saharian African countries to impose high import tariffs. Indeed, this has greatly assisted them to enjoy good advantage over foreign competitors. The speaker, on other hand points out that, over the past few decades these countries has lost huge sum while engaging in free trade and now they are suffering from loan debt which would not be the case if they were out of it. Moreover, they could raise enough surplus to be used for education and vaccination for every children of nation.
Finally, the reading passage also notes, this ensures the proper allocation of resources since they deliver goods to those who value the most. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that, they weaken the bargaining power of poor nation which results in diversion of world from multilateral free trade. For example, trading blocks in countries like US, Japan and so on suffer unequal bargain power that create challenges to obtain useful resources.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on the advantages of free trade, the speaker effectively challenges the writer's argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Th) must be used with a third-person verb: 'authors'.
Suggestion: authors
...y to flourish economy of any nation. Th author of the reading states that, this is ben...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'obtaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: obtaining
...al bargain power that create challenges to obtain useful resources. As we can see, the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
... the speaker effectively challenges the writers argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16717325228 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58137219599 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623100303951 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0200449108 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112542592843 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349455796932 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361710348131 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.058830734749 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343891391325 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.