Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Now get ready to answer the question. You may use your notes to help you answer.
The article states that dinosaurs are endotherm and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that many scientists have problems with the arguments and they don't agree to the claim dinosaurs are endotherm.
First, the reading states that dinosaur fossils have been discovered in polar regions. The professor refutes this point by stating that fossils that are discovered in polar regions are warmers than today. He explains that if dinosaurs are endotherm they could have migrated are hibernate to a warmer place that commonly does by modern reptiles. The professor states that this proves that dinosaurs are not endotherm.
Second, the article mentioned that there is a connection between endothermy and the position of the legs. However, the professor contends that the position of the legs doesn't have any connection with the endotherm. He also explains that dinosaurs are not high energy built endotherm for running instead of that the position of the legs in dinosaurs has another purpose of serving they support more weight and dinosaurs grow to large size. The professor says that being large as built its own advantage.
Third, the reading claims that there is a connection between endothermy and bone structure. The lecture opposes this point by adding growth rings. He elaborates on this by mentioning that dinosaurs do have Haversian canals and growth rings. Growth rings indicate thickening of the bone, presence of growth rings implies that the growth remains. The professor states that living animals that are not endotherm have a periodic growth they show cycles of rapid growth followed by slow/no growth then rapid growth, on the other hand, endotherm growth is rapid in cooler environments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ve problems with the arguments and they dont agree to the claim dinosaurs are endoth...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the claim dinosaurs are endotherm. First, the reading states that dinosaur ...
^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hibernated'.
Suggestion: hibernated
... endotherm they could have migrated are hibernate to a warmer place that commonly does by...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... contends that the position of the legs doesnt have any connection with the endotherm....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3152173913 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50840584316 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7146264241 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0522266462903 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0225423551096 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0218618428498 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0354462639735 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0101700919055 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.