summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
According to the passage, many people do not accept this idea that bees have lived on Earth for approximately 200 million years. The lecture, however, doubts this view by three strong views.
First, the passage explains that there are not any real fossils of bees that indicate the presence of bees on the earth 200 million years ago. This idea is refuted by the lecture, which claims that although we have no fossils of bees, it does not mean that bees did not exist in that time. A specific material (tree resin) is essential for fossilizing the bees. These trees were very rare in that period. Hence, the lack of fossils does not indicate the lack of bees.
Second, the passage thinks that because there were no flowering plants that bees fed on them, there were not any bees. The lecture, in contrast, disagrees with this belief, suggesting that the bees that lived in that period fed on non-flowering plants. Bees adapted themselves after evolving the plants.
Third, the author of the passage writes that the fossilized structures are not similar to today's bees. The lecture, on the contrary, states that although the fossilized structures do not have caps like modern bees, the chemical evidence shows that they have some waterproof material that worked like caps.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89351851852 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30649895172 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5679760016 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0833333333 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0610760746414 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241718845589 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255212174944 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0402850054871 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190670103079 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.