Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading states that, recent discoveries has shown the possibility of life on mars and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor clams that mars is an unfriendly planet and has ambiguity that it possesses life and refutes each point provided by the reading.
First, the reading claims that presence of methane on large amount, reading says meth amine bacteria on mars produce methane, is an evidence of life on mars. The professor opposes this point by saying that methane on mars may be due to volcanic eruption and discovery of active volcano supports professor point.
Second, the reading posit presence of maladroit on asteroid found on earth which came from mars points toward sustainability of life on mars as maladroit is produces by bacteria. But the professor claims that the asteroid had been on earth for more than 13000 years and has been contaminated contradicting the claims made by the reading.
Third, the reading says that presence of hydrogen on top soil of mars which shows the possibility of liquid water on mars showing possibility of life on mars. In the contrast to the reading, the professor says that the water found is ice which is even harsh for the existence of life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9512195122 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5722909142 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.8448805279 49.2860985944 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.875 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115988490094 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545367892553 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382441939955 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075507156064 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408818336047 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.