Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage
The passage and the lecture discuss whether the new restrict law for coal ashes are necessary for environment or not. The reading expresses that the new regulations are the cause existing new problems in environment. Whereas, the professor in the lecture disagrees with this idea and mentions that the presence of new regulations are indispensable.
First, the passage declares that the past environment regulations are more efficient rather than new regulation due to using liner in ever new pond or landfill. However, the lecturer claims that the pas regulations are not sufficient; therefore, existing new law is essential. If there is not stricter regulations, the ground water will become contaminated.
Moreover, the reading believes that recycling coal ashes are that major reason of reducing the environments risks. Nevertheless, the woman in the lecture refutes this idea with mentions that the people show the same behavior that they had had about mercury and their concerns; thus, there is not any concern about the recycling of coal ashes.
Finally, the passage points out that the results of new regulations is the cause of increasing the cost of services of Power companies. Although, the lecture has opposite opinion about this and mentions, eventhough the increasing of cost is true, but Power companies with change in their materials will be able to generate new services with lower cost rather than past situation.
Although the reading poses that the new regulation can be more dangerous than new setting and need to eliminate new regulations, the professor in the lecture refutes them by mentions consequents of environments dangers of coal ashes and declares about benefits of new regulations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31985294118 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85948829946 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485294117647 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6322072773 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.545454545 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0692846482207 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302949981613 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227373340988 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0423070323379 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178565816107 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.