Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage
The topic of the reading passage and the lecture discusses the issue of professors who appear on TV as guests on news programs where they give expert commentary on the latest events going on in the world. The author discussed this and explained that these appearances by the professors are of immense benefit to the professors themselves, the universities and even the general public. The lecture given by the professor refutes every point and justification made by the reading passage by presenting valid points about how it disagrees with the opinion of the author of the passage.
In the reading, the author begins by telling us that professors benefit from appearing on television and explained his reason by saying that they acquire reputations as authorities in their respective academic fields. the author emphasized that appearing on Television is a benefit to the professors because they are able to have a much wider audience compared to what they normally have if it was just to be in the campus. He explained that if the professor publishes his/her views in an academic journal for example, the only people who would have access and be able to learn about or appreciate the views are other scholars. That means the people who will read and appreciate it are only scholars but that when the professor appears on Tv, thousands of people outside the school or narrow academic community will have access and be aware of his paper. the professor of the lecture refutes this point and disagrees with the point. In the lecture, the professor states that appearing on television is not good for the image of the professor. He goes on to explain that when a professor appears on Tv, he tends to be seen as someone who is unserious and might not even be invited to important conferences. it will also be difficult for such professor to get funding for important research projects
The author also claims that universities benefit from the professors who appear on the television because in the author's opinion, the universities receive publicity when their professors appear on Television because when people see a knowledgeable faculty member on television, they think more highly of that university. they believe that the university is highly prestigious ir reputable. Again, the lecture believes that there are flaws in this stance. The lecture believes the writers argument is flawed because it is a total waste of time by the professor, the professor waste valuable time which would have otherwise be used by the professor to carry out university work. the lecture states that the time spent by the professor on Tv is time wasted same as the time the professor spends travelling, making up, or even the time spent rehearsing for the television appearance.
Therefore, the lecture disagrees with the reading and believes the university does not really gain since the professor is wasting the time that is meant to be used doing research, meeting students and even doing university business. the lecturer believes the time is being wasted appearing on television.
Another belief that the author hold as regards professors appearing on television is that he believes that the general public also gain from such appearance, the professor in the listening passage is doubtful and refutes the point explaining that the general public gaining from such appearance is a believe that is not clear and even doubtful. the lecturer believes that the host of the television and even viewers are not interested in the academic lecturer or paper presentations. He states that what they want is the title which they are mostly interested in. they are interested in the title even more than the intellectual substance. The lecture refutes the opinion that the author holds on the the public gain from the television appearance.
in conclusion, the lecture totally refutes every point made by the reading passage with clear examples and details.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...emselves, the universities and even the general public. The lecture given by the professor ref...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...iversities and even the general public. The lecture given by the professor refutes ...
^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...es in their respective academic fields. the author emphasized that appearing on Tel...
^^^
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... people who will read and appreciate it are only scholars but that when the profess...
^^^
Line 2, column 856, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... have access and be aware of his paper. the professor of the lecture refutes this p...
^^^
Line 2, column 1207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...en be invited to important conferences. it will also be difficult for such profess...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...appear on the television because in the authors opinion, the universities receive publi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...y think more highly of that university. they believe that the university is highly p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...n this stance. The lecture believes the writers argument is flawed because it is a tota...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...professor to carry out university work. the lecture states that the time spent by t...
^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...nts and even doing university business. the lecturer believes the time is being was...
^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...television is that he believes that the general public also gain from such appearance, the pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...d refutes the point explaining that the general public gaining from such appearance is a belie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... public gaining from such appearance is a believe that is not clear and even doubtful. th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ublic gaining from such appearance is a believe that is not clear and even doubtful. th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ve that is not clear and even doubtful. the lecturer believes that the host of the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...es the opinion that the author holds on the the public gain from the television appeara...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 697, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...es the opinion that the author holds on the the public gain from the television appeara...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...c gain from the television appearance. in conclusion, the lecture totally refutes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, therefore, as regards, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 10.4613686534 315% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 7.30242825607 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 35.0 12.0772626932 290% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 22.412803532 241% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 30.3222958057 261% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3292.0 1373.03311258 240% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 651.0 270.72406181 240% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05683563748 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05120793913 4.04702891845 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72555183002 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 145.348785872 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.374807987711 0.540411800872 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1050.3 419.366225166 250% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 21.0 8.23620309051 255% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.3506070066 49.2860985944 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.130434783 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3043478261 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 19.0 4.19205298013 453% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206760704891 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840938913256 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832836031472 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15591245677 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890241819214 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 63.6247240618 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.