Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage.
The article state that professors are and can be found in the school environmen, in libraries, lectur rooms or in their offices. The passage also point out that professor also apear on televison as guest on a program providing academic or expact view on specific event. The passage explains that this is a good thing for the professor as it allow the professor to present his ideas to a wider audience. However, the professor explains that appearing on televison does not benefit the professor, rather it put the professor at a disadvantage. The professor is considered a celebrity professor and his fellow professor might not consider him as a serious academic personnel. He might not get invited to important confrences and might loss the opportunity of getting funds for his research.
second, the passage point out that the professor appearing on television will be a good thing for the university as it provides publicity for the university, the publicity means more respect for the univerity and this will inturn encurage more students to apply to the university. However, the professor refutes this point by stating that the professor apearing on televison will take away valuable time from the professor. The time the professor is meant to speand preparing for lectures and other accademic activites like research work, will be spent traviling and trying to look good for the camera.
Lastly, the reading point out that the public will benefit from the appearance of the professor on television. By getting an expact opinon on event happing around them. Mean while, the professor say's that the public does not benefit from the appearance of the professor on televison. She pointed out that TV producers do not want indepth accademic research, that the professor will end up presending a article which a easily be research and presented by a simple TV presenter.
This few points are the reasons the professor refutes the opions of the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...demic or expact view on specific event. The passage explains that this is a good th...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...y of getting funds for his research. second, the passage point out that the profess...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...ct opinon on event happing around them. Mean while, the professor says that the public doe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...at the professor will end up presending a article which a easily be research and ...
^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... will end up presending a article which a easily be research and presented by a s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, look, second, so, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07120743034 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73642180486 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486068111455 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2419729901 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117080302127 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529247078413 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412411573042 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871778270861 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00234141286838 0.0443174109184 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.