Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the
specific problems presented in the reading passage
The article state that Rambrant is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dauch painter and it also pointed out that there is doubt about some painting attributed to him stating the example of a portrait of an elderly woman in a white bonnet. However, the professor explains that the painting is indeed by Rambrant, she pointed out few point that explains the points stated in the passage that shows the painting wasn't by Rambrant.
First, the article pointed out that Rambrant pays attention to details, pointing out that there are some inconsistency in the way the portrait was painted. It pointed out that the woman's outfit in the painting shows a combination of servant wear and luxurious wear. However, the professor pointed out in the lecture that the luxurious fur collar was added to the painting a century after it was painted to improve it market value.
Secondly, the article pointed out that since Rambrandt is a master of details, he wouldn't have made mistates in the ligting of the painting. It pointed out that lighting and shadow in this painting do not fit. He pointed out that fur on the painting does not refelct light on it, rather, it casted a shadow on it. However, the professor pointed out that the extra details added to in other to improve it value, was the course of the shadow which is present on the painting.
Thirdly, the passage made a point about the material in which the painting was painted on. The article pointed out that the wood used for the painting was made from several pieces of wood gluded together. The professor in the lecture explained that the painting was indeed done one a single pice of wood. The wood was the same as one of the wood in one of Rambrandt other painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun point seems to be countable; consider using: 'few points'.
Suggestion: few points
... is indeed by Rambrant, she pointed out few point that explains the points stated in the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... in the passage that shows the painting wasnt by Rambrant. First, the article poin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'inconsistencies'?
Suggestion: inconsistencies
...tails, pointing out that there are some inconsistency in the way the portrait was painted. It...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'markets'?
Suggestion: markets
...tury after it was painted to improve it market value. Secondly, the article pointed...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ce Rambrandt is a master of details, he wouldnt have made mistates in the ligting of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'values'?
Suggestion: values
...details added to in other to improve it value, was the course of the shadow which is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... indeed done one a single pice of wood. The wood was the same as one of the wood in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70723684211 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49963423571 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421052631579 0.540411800872 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2710542101 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137884908139 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656253093275 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412842495749 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967888667133 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144884670734 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.