Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage. TPO 6
The author describes that there are some problems with communal online encyclopedias and provides three reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the lecturer states that even though the communal online encyclopedias are not completely perfect, the author's reasons have prejudice and ignorance to how far communal online encyclopedias are practical.
First of all, the writer states that despite the fact that traditional encyclopedias are written by skillful specialists, communal online encyclopedia usually has academic authority deficiency. Nevertheless, the professor points out that both traditional and online encyclopedias have some errors and traditional ones are not close to accurately perfect. Moreover, it is really easy to correct mistakes in the online encyclopedia is, but errors in traditional ones will remain for decades.
Second, according to the reading, even the original text in the online encyclopedias is accurate, hackers can manipulate the information in the encyclopedias and decrease its academic value. Besides, in case authorities want to make some changes in the original text, the online encyclopedias will not be altered. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that online encyclopedias set some new policies to protect the information from the hackers; for example, provide a reliable format to protect crucial information; in addition, some editors are responsible for making changes and eliminating wrong information done by malicious hackers.
Third, the author expresses that the communal online encyclopedias pay attention to both trivial and important topics, which confuses the users. However, the speaker posits that traditional encyclopedias have limited space, so they should make decisions to judge whether this topic is important or not, to provide more space, which cannot reflect the great range of interest in society. Furthermore, he says that space is not an issue for online encyclopedias. The authors can provide a lot of academic articles and a great variety of information for applicants reflect the great diversity of user's interest, and this attribute gives the online encyclopedias strong advantage over traditional ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, really, second, so, third, for example, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71865443425 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08227147734 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 419.366225166 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7741822872 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.833333333 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5833333333 7.06452816374 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0225438891041 0.272083759551 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.010899588495 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0175694264841 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.015666637535 0.162205337803 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00638098364024 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.3589403974 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 53.8541721854 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.0289183223 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.2367328918 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.7273730684 154% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.