Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people now are more likely to help others than young people were in the past.
Helping is not only a means of strengthening relationships, but an efficient way of being successful. However, controversy arises recently about in which period young people are more helpful; youngster in the past or today. Some argue that young people in the past are more willing to help others compared to today, but for me, I hold the totally opposite view.
Admittedly, living in such a world undergoing constant changes, individuals, especially young people, feel more pressures than ever before, which makes us have less time to contact with others to say nothing of acting as a contributing factor someone. For example, young ones those are busy with their studies or works may have little time to meet others even most near neighbors. However, in fact, as economic reforms are being accelerated, young people today are more highly likely to give others a hand because of the advance of means and stronger needs for success.
For starters, technology functions as a platform for young people to aid others. Thanks to developed technology has already changed various aspects in our lives, young ones can reduce their cost to assist someone, such as time, energy and money, meaning that young ones are more easily to help others. For example, according to the latest research conducted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), there are more than 90 percentage youngsters who using WeChat. I am the monitor in my class, which means I have to serve my professors and classmates when needing help. Actually, I have a great deal of study issues and part-time job loads, so I can’t always have access to meet my professors or classmates face to face, whereas because of WeChat, I can assist them online and save my time. That is, if one of my professors would like to let me convey crucial information to all of my classmates, I will build a group involved in all of my classmates on WeChat and then send this important announcement to this group as opposed to talk to then one after another.
In addition, contemporary young ones have relatively stronger desire for friends, for which they will buckle down to help others, expanding their relationship net. Starting a business, for instance, need a great quantity of support and assistance. In this situation, an enormous relationship net is able to give young ones more cooperative partners and investors. Besides that, due to Chinese family planning policy, one household is limited to only one child. As a result, this generation of youngsters nowadays doesn’t have sisters or brothers. Therefore, what they need to do is to extend their friendship net, compensating the lack of companies by sisters and brothers.
To conclude, though young ones today are facing greater burden and have less time to aid others, the advanced technology and stronger need for giant relationship net do play an important role in making them help others more than in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns and stronger needs for success. For starters, technology functions as a ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2449.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0081799591 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73486782303 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543967280164 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1859537639 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.894736842 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7368421053 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25120247934 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870580069921 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782530044858 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174373845388 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770115618218 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.