The author describes that nowadays young people are reading less literature than they used to which is really have a bad impact on culture and provides three reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the lecturer states that although people read less literature in these days, it does not mean that it causes unpleasant effects on the society and culture and refutes each of the author's points with rational grounds.
First of all, the writer states that nothing but literature can provide the intellectual stimulation that literature does. Nevertheless, the professor states that the science, political and history books provide intellectual stimulation, and they have high quality. These books provide great creation and imaginations as literature books provide. It is unfair to say that if someone does not read literature, means that s/he will not read high-quality books.
Second, according to the reading, the majority of people prefer trivial forms of entertainment, such as watching television and music videos, which has lowered the level of culture in general. However, the speaker brings up the idea that form of the representation of the culture has changed in these days. To put it differently, people can watch a brilliant movie and listen to a good music in order to gain information about the culture rather than reading literature books. In this day and age, culture is not written and we witness different forms of culture.
Third, the writer expresses that although there are many talented writers today, they lack an audience. Conversely, the professor posits that there is less support for literature due to authors' faults. To be more specific, modern literature is difficult to understand. So, audience shortage has nothing to do with poor standards of today's readers.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ature than they used to which is really have a bad impact on culture and provides th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, therefore, third, in general, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23333333333 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73690011185 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7887091172 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435385315292 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130620493464 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629357043315 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214568523147 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660345141261 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.