Which one is the most important factor to help you work productively?
- Having an environment which is free of noise and distractions
- Knowing that you will receive a reward
- Doing something you are interested in
Nowadays, there is a heated trend among people to be more productive in their works. As a matter of fact, economic recession and unemployment crisis could be an important warning to individuals who do not care about their work productivity. While in this day and age some people subscribe to the view that working in a field of interest is the most significant pillar of productivity, others look at this concept through a different lens. Be that as it may, many remain neutral and adamantly claim that a myriad of elements should be taken into the consideration so as to be able to prove which belief is closer to reality. To my way of thinking, the more people like their fields of work, the more productively they work. So I can say that this statement is the one I can be in agreement with. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my conspicuous viewpoints.
This argument is supported with the persuasively stated evidence not just opinion that working in fields you highly are interested is always the best policy to shine brilliantly at work. Being engaged in the favorite specialty makes you highly motivated to continue our attempts to reach the pinnacle of your job. In fact, world of work has a wide assortment challenges that may encounter every freshman, and without having a sturdy incentive, no one can copes with these ahead unexpected problems. As a case in point, I vividly remember, ten years ago, when I worked in a computer programming office, and I had a hard time dealing with a problem that I could not apply my wide breadth knowledge into practice in order to solve the bugs of the system. Despite the hard situation at work, I did not give up my endeavor, and I stayed overnight to improvise a solution to address the problem, which helped me to broaden my insight into how to handle this same situation in the future. Therefore, my personal experience competently corroborate the fact that working in the field you are interested in is the best option to be an inexhaustible person in various challenges, albeit difficult at times.
By the same token, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that in addition to having strong propellant to push you forward, people will be more happy and have fresh mind by choosing their fields of interest at work, which fosters the development of the sense of self-satisfaction is its crowning achievement. The sentiment expressed in this sentence embodies the view that, being involved in the favorite fields not only increases people's happiness and enhances people's mental health, but also boosts their productivity in their whole life affairs. From the scientific perspective, last week I observed results of an article about human behaviors in life. According to the research, the rate of successful individuals at their works who have complacency in their lives are significantly higher than those who did not have. Hence, these worthwhile statistics throw some light on the point that involving in the fields of interest and working productively are inextricably intertwined.
By and large, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I vehemently agree with this standpoint that engaging in the favorite fields of specialty helps people to be more productive at work. Now the inevitable question is why some people do not choose the fields of their interests at work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 564, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... should be taken into the consideration so as to be able to prove which belief is closer...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'cope'
Suggestion: cope
...t having a sturdy incentive, no one can copes with these ahead unexpected problems. A...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, as to, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, by and large, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 52.1666666667 171% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98930481283 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92318268285 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534759358289 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 879.3 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7905085641 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.95 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.05 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209069939805 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651104763312 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418386670746 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132045028378 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323373949497 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 86.8835125448 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.