The government wants to fund one of the following areas to improve children s education Which one do you think is better Why hire more teachers to teach in a small class make preschool education before kindergarten mandatory provide some training co

Essay topics:

The government wants to fund one of the following areas to improve children's education. Which one do you think is better? Why?- hire more teachers to teach in a small class- make preschool education before kindergarten mandatory- provide some training co

governments have been always trying to improve the educational system because they exactly know how a productive educational system contributes to enhancing the country’s future. Therefore, by investing money in this section they want to guarantee their future generation. There are various ways to improve students’ education such as hiring more teachers to have a smaller class with fewer students, providing some courses to enhance teachers’ performance in the class or oblige children to go to a preschool before kindergarten. I, personally, think that hiring more instructors to have smaller classes is the most effective way to improve children’s education for two main reasons that I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.

First and foremost, a small class makes more opportunities for children to participate in the class’s discussions. Declaring personal ideas and exchanging viewpoints are crucial factors in the learning process. When a teacher is talking about a concept or teach the lessons, many questions will arise in the student’s minds. In a classroom with many attendances, students do not have a chance to speak equally; hence, some of them will be deprived of engaging in the class and participate actively. A personal example can drive this notion home. When I was a student in elementary school, I lived in a small city with a low population of students in the class. Therefore, after each question teacher asked the answer from all of us. Therefore, such a class was conducive to our education dramatically.

Second, teachers in a big class with a large number of students will be exhausted and are lea likely to stay productive for whole the workday. It goes without saying that teachers have many tasks in the class such as teaching, answering questions, checking homework, to name but a few. Normally, the more students a class has, the more labor a mentor has and as a result, the less productive the mentor is. To elucidate on, in the class that I mentioned in the above, had our class had many children, our teacher would not have been energetic, and would not have spent a lot of time to ask questions from each of us.

In conclusion, taking two mentioned reasons into account, I do believe that hiring more teachers to have a smaller class is the better choice to enhance the educational situation. In this way, not only children learn more in the class, but also teachers stay more productive for whole the day.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
governments have been always trying to improve the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'make'?
Suggestion: make
.... First and foremost, a small class makes more opportunities for children to part...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... Second, teachers in a big class with a large number of students will be exhausted and are lea ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, talking about, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03658536585 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89279089175 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7481608012 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.722222222 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279355234008 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881453643203 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754925984923 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185779339126 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787376335428 0.0645574589148 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.