Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. TPO 54
The professor in the lecture does not agree with the ways to decrease salt level in The Salton Sea in California that provided by the reading, The professor tries to persuade his class that all these three solutions are unrealistic and not practical.
First, Regarding Using special desalination facilities, The lecture avers that this facilities will leave behind solid materials.These solid materials contain some chemical toxic materials. So, If wind spread these toxic materials in air, People will breath them. Therefore, It will increase health risks. This point directly refutes the point from the reading which states that we can use desalination facilities to remove salt from lake's water directly.
Second, According to dilution using ocean water, The speakers asserts that to deliver water from ocean, We need a lot of constructions but the local government does not have enough money. The shore line is 100 kilometers so, it is very expensive to build. Again, this point contradict the point from the passage which claims that the ocean water could be delivered through pipelines or canals.
Third, according to dividing the lake into several sections, The professor argues that this solution will not work for very long time. She says that the lake can face earth activities like earthquake. These earth activity could collapse the walls so, the water will go from special sections to main section. So, this point casts doubt the point from the reading because the reading says that we can construct walls to divide the lake into several sections. Therefore the small sections will have water with high salinity while the big section will have less salinity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons are unrealistic and not practical. First, Regarding Using special desalinat...
^^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tion facilities, The lecture avers that this facilities will leave behind solid mate...
^^^^
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...ities will leave behind solid materials.These solid materials contain some chemical t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remove salt from lakes water directly. Second, According to dilution using ocea...
^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat to deliver water from ocean, We need a lot of constructions but the local gov...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...delivered through pipelines or canals. Third, according to dividing the lake in...
^^
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... divide the lake into several sections. Therefore the small sections will have water with...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18081180812 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47062231413 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586715867159 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0096015997 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0590703246883 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221657229187 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409397826528 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0333297025265 0.162205337803 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193758320619 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.