Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the point made in the reading.
Both the reading and the listening discuss productivity and rewards at work. The article states that they enhance the quality of the employee of being rewarded. However, the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading. The professor says that the employees did not like it.
The first point the professor makes is that the employees did not want to work because of the idea of being rewarded. He explains that they could not see the reward. As an example he says that it was actually a contra productivity. This point casts doubt from the point made in the reading. The latter states that the rewards are attached to the performance which gauges the amount of productivity.
Furthermore, the professor points out that those workers look the work as a way of punishment not otherwise. He illustrates that it is a sort of manipulation, or disappointment is equal punishment and the more desirable it is the less rewarded it is. It can even be damaged. This point casts doubt from the information from the reading. According to the passage whatever the reward given, it can be benefit the employee attitude.
Finally, the lecture states that if you had a problem at work, just keep quite instead of talking to your boss because this this way you can damage what you have been doing so far. This point casts doubt from the reading's key point. According to the article it is possible to persuade people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-26 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
- In today's era, TV has become very important part of life as a medium to spread intelligence and social awareness. Do you think it could have other side as well? 55
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of he 55
- The administrators of a university are revising their budget and have decided to change their funding priorities As a result the university will now spend more money on sports and athletic facilities than they do on the campus libraries Do you think this 76
- Nowadays the world is developing at a very rapid pace and we are constantly forced to make a lot of choices that can affect the rest of our lives Do you agree or disagree with the idea that we should always ask someone else for help when we need to make a 60
- Some people like to spend their money as soon as they earn it while others think it is better to save their money for some time in the future Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion Do not use memorized examples 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ins that they could not see the reward. As an example he says that it was actually...
^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: this
...instead of talking to your boss because this this way you can damage what you have been d...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73983739837 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61645923844 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508130081301 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7745085317 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.5882352941 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335703824784 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116354216085 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171891930256 0.0662205650399 260% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212020194899 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553766811806 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.