Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Youngers use parents as a mirror for their lives. Occasionaly, they have one favourity athlete as a token to their lives or, maybe, a film star.
First of all, teenagers dream of becoming a sport star merely because they have seen their adorable athlete on TV and they want to pursue the same steps. However, this happens eventually due to the fact that their sport star becomes faddishless. Therefore, sport stars tend to be tasteless.
Moreover, every young people have already watched fight films only to try to act as their prefered actor in real life. For instance, when I was young, I watched fight films and afterwards I tried to imitate the actor actions with friends. But, it was only for the occasion.
Furthermore, the only people who are taken as a model are the parents. It happens because youngesters see parents as examples of life. They are taugh by parents how to be a respected and educated person in life. And, this makes them to realize that parents are their heroes.
Finally, sports stars and film stars are seeing only temporaly as models. On the other hands, parents are those who play the role model in youngers lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 6.10837438424 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 1207.87684729 78% => OK
No of words: 200.0 242.827586207 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38746727726 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 139.433497537 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 379.143842365 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3499015394 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.7142857143 104.977214359 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2857142857 20.9669160288 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 2.91625615764 274% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228746445595 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834712917773 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782247308762 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136135298063 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903794210945 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 12.6369458128 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.5310837438 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.