Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Today, many youngsters follow celebrities like sports and movie stars as their role model. This can be seen on all over social media. It is disagreed to follow successful sports person or glamorous movie star. This will be shown by taking into account immoral acts of these sports personalities and derogatory roles played by film stars.
To begin with, recently many cases have been published of athletes using illegal steroids. This may influence their innocent followers negatively. For example, a few years ago, Lance Armstrong, 7 times winner of Tour de France was found guilty of using performance enhancer drugs. It goes without saying that, youngsters must be discouraged to follow such sports stars.
Furthermore, it’s often seen that glamorous film stars play derogatory roles in movies. For instance, Sanjay Dutt, a famous actor from Indian cinemas often plays a role of mafia and villain: taking drugs, robbing banks and living a lavish lifestyle. This sets a bad example for adolescents. It is obvious from this example that movies stars shouldn’t be ideal role models. Thus, youngster’s admiration of these personalities should not be supported.
This analysis proves that all successful sports stars and film stars may not be ideal role models. In a nutshell, youngsters should not be supported to follow these jazzy personalities blindly. It is recommended to teach youth to follow virtuous characters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...a. It is disagreed to follow successful sports person or glamorous movie star. This wi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38495575221 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84411410494 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62389380531 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0120314354 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0625 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.125 20.9669160288 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294468511959 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101253115968 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120181218171 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188216134098 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967730129443 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.