summarize the points in the passage, being sure to explain how they challenge the ethanol fuel described in the reading passage
In the reading passage, the author discusses that ethanol fuel that made from plants such as corn and sugar cane is not a good replacement for gasoline, while the lecture claims that what the passage state is not convincing and disputes those ideas presented in the passage with several proofs.
Firstly, according to the reading passage, it is suggested that the increased use of ethanol fuel would not help to solve global warming that is one of the greatest environmental troubles caused by gasoline use because ethanol fuel releases carbon dioxide which is a greenhouse gas into the atmosphere. In contrast, the professor argues in the lecture that it is not true. Ethanol is made from plants and every plant absorbs carbon dioxide as part of its nutrient, thus the growing plants remove the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
In addition, the statement in the reading material indicates that the production of significant of ethanol would dramatically reduce the amount of plants available for animals. On the contrary, the professor points out that people can produce ethanol using cellulose that is the component of the plants' cell walls. And this kind of plants are not eaten by animals so that there are abundant food for animals to eat.
Finally, the author of the reading passage claims that the prices of ethanol and gasoline for the consumer are currently about the same due to the help by the United States government. However, the speaker argues that if a lot of people come to buy ethanol fuel, the prices will certainly go down and the tax subsidies are no longer needed. For example, if ethanol production could be three times greater than it is now, the cost of producing a unit of ethanol will drop by forty percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
... cellulose that is the component of the plants cell walls. And this kind of plants are...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88513513514 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49905022134 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52027027027 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6911592775 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.6 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 21.698381199 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20424010621 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749121248873 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559039913207 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126391701174 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455960697386 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.