summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the reading part explains a kind of ancient animals that are called agnostic and explains three ways how may have lived and the listening section cast doubt on information presented in the passage and argues that all theories have weakens and then illustrates these weakens.
First, the passage points that agnostics are free-swimming predators. However, the lecture makes the point that their predators had had large eyes when eyes of agnostids were tiny so their predators could pray them easily. therefore, she claims that there aren't any fossil evidence for the first theory.
Second, according to the text agnostics were seafloor dweller. the speaker disagrees with this point, and, asserts that agnostids moved very fast because there are many fossils of the in multiple are so that the could move extant area in the ancient ocean. there is no doubt that according to the evidence come from fossils, she can reject this theory.
Third, the article claims that they were parasites. on the contrary, the lecturer points out that agnostids were such large animals that could not be parasites because they had needed to have so bulky hosts so that this evidence role out the theory.
In conclusion, the talk bolsters, the mentioned pieces of the information in the passage
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salarmoheb | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | salarmoheb | 90 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | salarmoheb | 3 | view |
- TPO41 3
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 90
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? famous entertainers and athletics deserve to have more privacy than they have now.use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...re makes the point that their predators had had large eyes when eyes of agnostids were ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...their predators could pray them easily. therefore, she claims that there arent any fossil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...asily. therefore, she claims that there arent any fossil evidence for the first theor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e text agnostics were seafloor dweller. the speaker disagrees with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... move extant area in the ancient ocean. there is no doubt that according to the evide...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...rticle claims that they were parasites. on the contrary, the lecturer points out t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, well, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06976744186 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40229744012 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576744186047 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0921152288 49.2860985944 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144969794585 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485412469535 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411689430411 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693358346747 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425951785888 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.