There is a writing about a painting which is said that it is not a painting of Rembrandt, and there is a lecture about it which is said that it is Rembrandt's painting. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure explain how they answer the specific problems presented in writing.
In this set of materials, the reading passage and the listening section are about a painting called Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. While the writer is in the opinion that it was not painted by Rembrandt's himself, the lecturer claims that it is an original painting made by Rembrandt.
Firstly, the writer states that there is a contradict between the cloths of woman in the painting, so as a careful painter Rembrant did not lose attention for details. On the other hand, the lecturer points out that the pigments in the painting are shown as in the original paintings, thus it was probably painted by Rembrandt.
Secondly, the writer indicates that although in the painting the face of woman is illuminated by light reflected onto it from below, the face is in dark. As a master of painting, Rembrandt did not make such an error. In contrast, the lecturer says that the painter used simple color to be reflected by light. Thus, the face of woman was illuminated. This is so realistic as in the original paintings of Remberandt.
Lastly, according to author although Rembrandt often painted on single wood panels, this painting was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood, so it is probably not Remberandt's painting. On the contrary, the professor states that it is true that Rembrandt's orginal paintings was made on single piece of wood, but Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet was made on a piece of wood enlarged.
All in all, while the writer states that several proufs shows that Portrait of an Eldery Woman in a White Bonnet is not a painting of Rembrandt, the lecturer opposes this idea with three claims.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...irstly, the writer states that there is a contradict between the cloths of woman in the pain...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in contrast, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76124567474 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60609459273 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439446366782 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1484738381 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249404387172 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104249619451 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738611754635 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155765394131 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050089312894 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.