The reading and the lecture are both about artificial reefs that nade of enormous materials. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about the pros of establishing fake reef. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that these new reefs will make more problems than benefits.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states artificial reefs can enhance the competition to the small fishers who compete with the large firms. The article mentions that this new area will provide encouragement to the small fishers, so they can help their society. This argument is chaleenged by the lecturer. He claims that it is not necessary to increase the overall population for all fish, because artificial reefs will atract the fish from many places to stay in distance location. Additionally, he points out that this will decline the fish population.
Secondly, the author suggests an asteroid colony is valuable of many raw materials. In the article, it is said that the sponsores of these colonies will pay more to mining these minerals and back them to earth. Again, the professor specifically addresses this point when he states establish these reefs in secreat locations will cause safety problems. He goes on to say that make these reefs in know place will not make a good competition for the small fishers.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that this new area it is an outstanding place for recycling the materials that did not be used. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with this claim by contending that recycle these materials will make enviromental damage like asborn reef which made from the cars wheel. He notes that after storm these wheels scatterd on sea floor and made environmental damage for the marine animals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06578947368 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63190787418 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4057545407 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.25 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126393158575 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418382017501 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295822818364 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079163170129 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314110356054 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.