Based on the passage, wood companies in the US is less likely to seek for eco-certification, what indicates these companies achieved the specific standards by using ecologically friendly methods. By contrast, the lecturer posits that there are several solid reasons to think they will be beneficial for American wood businesses.
Firstly, the author asserts that being eco-friendly may not make these products distinctive from those of other companies as American customers don't have the reliance on advertising claims. This concept is refuted by the lecturer, who suggests that Americans are likely to react very favorably to wood products ecologically certified by an independent organization with an international reputation for trustworthiness as they have a lot of confidence in independent certification agencies.
Secondly, the passage contends that these kinds of products might be more pricey than their uncertified counterparts due to the fact that companies have to pay the organization for being tested. The lecturer, however, disagrees with this belief, proposing that Americans often do choose on factors other than price. Moreover, people are becoming increasingly convinced of the value of preserving and protecting the environment.
Finally, the passage introduces the idea that the products of American companies are purchased mainly in the US, so it is pointless for them to take these actions. On the contrary, the lecturer states that companies should pay attention to what is going on this sector internationally, not because of foreign consumers, but because of foreign competition. If not, you can be sure that foreign companies will soon start crowding into the American market.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f other companies as American customers dont have the reliance on advertising claims...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60617760618 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17906251666 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0704021744 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.2 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160773598325 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657155996761 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341981312642 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10284679759 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035650250792 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.8541721854 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.