BOTH LISTENING AND READING DISCUSS THE SEA OTTTERS WHICH LIVES WESTERN COAST OF NORTH AMERICA FROM CALIFORNIA TO ALASKA. THE READING CLAIMS THAT THE NUMBER OF SEA OTTERS HAVE DRAMATICLY DECLINED AND PROVIDE SEVERAL REASONS. HOWEVER, THE LISTENING CLAIM THAT SOME OF THESE THEORY WEAK OR WRONG AND REFUTES EACH AUTHOR’S THEORY.
FIRSTLY, THE ARTICLE POSIT THAT THE ALASKAN COAST WAS EFFECTED BY OİL RİGS AND INDISTRUAL CHEMICAL POLLUTION. OTTERS DIED ILLNESS STEM FROM POISONUS WATER. ON THE CONTRARY, THE LECTURER OPPOSE IT AND PROCLAIMS THAT THE THEORY IS WEAK SINCE NO ONE CAN NOT FIND THE DEATH OF OTTERS. IF THESE ANIMALS HAVE AN INFECTION SOMEONE SHOULD FIND THEM.
SECOND EXPLANATION WHICH USED BY READING IS NOT ONLY SEA OTTERS ADVERSLY EFFECTED FROM ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, BUT ALSO SOME OTHER PREDATORS, ESPECIALLY ORCAS, EFFECTED. THESE ANIMALS CHANGES THEIR DIET AND PREFER HUNT ORHER WHALES. CONVERSELY, PROFESSOR SAYS THAT ORCAS DID NOT DISSAPPER BECAUSE OF POLLUTION. THEY RUN AWAY FROM HUMAN HUNTERS. MOREOVER THEY CHANGED THEIR DIET AND HUNTER DIFFERENT ANIMALS.
LASTLY, THE READING STATES THAT POLLUTION THEORY HELP TO UNDERSTAND OTHER EFFECT. THE OCEANS CURRENT MIGHT EFFECT. HOWEVER, THE ARTICLE REJECT THIS POINT. ACCORDING TO HER, ORCAS CANNOT ACCESS TO SHAWALLOW SEE WHICH SEA OTHERS HAVE NOT DECLINED.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this THEORY' or 'THESE theories'?
Suggestion: This THEORY; THESE theories
...WEVER, THE LISTENING CLAIM THAT SOME OF THESE THEORY WEAK OR WRONG AND REFUTES EACH AUTHOR&a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “IF” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...O ONE CAN NOT FIND THE DEATH OF OTTERS. IF THESE ANIMALS HAVE AN INFECTION SOMEONE...
^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...D FIND THEM. SECOND EXPLANATION WHICH USED BY READING IS NOT ONLY SEA OTTERS A...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'change'.
Suggestion: Change
...PECIALLY ORCAS, EFFECTED. THESE ANIMALS CHANGES THEIR DIET AND PREFER HUNT ORHER WHALES...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: MOREOVER,
...TION. THEY RUN AWAY FROM HUMAN HUNTERS. MOREOVER THEY CHANGED THEIR DIET AND HUNTER DIFF...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: Affect
... OTHER EFFECT. THE OCEANS CURRENT MIGHT EFFECT. HOWEVER, THE ARTICLE REJECT THIS POINT...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46634615385 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4137823492 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.663461538462 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4891651014 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.0625 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 21.698381199 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108540329981 0.272083759551 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313796850192 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505000688866 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640047299432 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304541701572 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.42419426049 127% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.