The article mentioned about the benefits of an employee willing to work for 4 days of the week. Moreover, article claimed 3 major benefits about this policy but the professor refutes these claims one by one by giving the explaination to support his views.
First, the article posits that companies will be able to increase the profits as number of errors will be reduced and employees will be more productive. However, the professor says that profits would not increase as companies will need to hire more employees and company has to pay for additional medical expenses, office space and equipments like computers to the new employees which can reduce the profits.
Secondly, article asserts that employment rate will be decreased as, more and more people will get a job to fill the gaps. But the professor claims that as the expenses would be more high and hiring could reduce the profit, companies will start expecting more from their employees such as overtime from other employees, which will hurt the chances of hiring new employees.
Thirdly, the author claims that free time or additional day would contribute to the quality life for an employee who would work for four days a week.On the other hand, the speaker's opinion is that it will put make an employee more prone to loose a job when compared with the one who is working five days a week because the person who is working 5 days a week would be more stable and reliable for the company and inaddition to this promotions would be given to the employees that works for five days a week rather than the one who is working four days a week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'one by'.
Suggestion: one by
... but the professor refutes these claims one by one by giving the explaination to support his ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...yee who would work for four days a week.On the other hand, the speakers opinion is...
^^
Line 8, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...four days a week.On the other hand, the speakers opinion is that it will put make an emp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 241, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...will put make an employee more prone to loose a job when compared with the one who is...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 428, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...iable for the company and inaddition to this promotions would be given to the employ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74377224199 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39694443772 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491103202847 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 21.2450331126 188% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 146.477413457 49.2860985944 297% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.428571429 110.228320801 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.1428571429 21.698381199 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1428571429 7.06452816374 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183045961984 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763459807559 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124587159419 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10726133487 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132643524908 0.0443174109184 299% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.3589403974 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 11.0289183223 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.1 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.498013245 171% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.2008830022 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.