The article mentioned about the benefits of an employee willing to work for 4 days of the week. Moreover, the article claimed 3 major benefits about this policy but the professor refutes these claims one by one by giving the explanation to support his views.
First, the article posits that companies will be able to increase the profits as a number of errors will be reduced and employees will be more productive. However, the professor says that profits would not increase as companies will need to hire more employees and the company has to pay for additional medical expenses, office space and equipment like computers to the new employees which can reduce the profits.
Secondly, the article asserts that the employment rate will be decreased as more and more people will get a job to fill the gaps. But the professor claims that as the expenses would be higher and hiring could reduce the profit, companies will start expecting more from their employees such as overtime from other employees, which will hurt the chances of hiring new employees.
Thirdly, the author claims that free time or an additional day would contribute to the quality of life for an employee who would work four days a week. On the other hand, the speaker's opinion is that it will put make an employee more prone to lose a job when compared with the one who is working five days a week because the person who is working 5 days a week would be more stable and reliable for the company and in addition to this promotions would be given to the employees that work for five days a week rather than the one who is working four days a week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'one by'.
Suggestion: one by
... but the professor refutes these claims one by one by giving the explanation to support his v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
...our days a week. On the other hand, the speakers opinion is that it will put make an emp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...able for the company and in addition to this promotions would be given to the employ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63888888889 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37410639459 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475694444444 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 21.2450331126 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.3305358831 49.2860985944 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 110.228320801 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 21.698381199 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.875 7.06452816374 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18540873042 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946709319135 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125328497101 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107521969791 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133071207472 0.0443174109184 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.498013245 156% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.