The reading and the lecture are both about the pros and cons of lowering the days of work from five- day workweek to four-day. While the article mentions that reducing the day of work is better for employees and companies. However, the lecturer disputes all the claims mentioned by the author.
Firstly, the writer claims that working for four- day workweek instead of five- day workweek would make the payment less for the employees hence, it is good for companies financially since they pay for four-day workweek. In contrast, the professor says that the four-day workweek would force companies or businesses to add more workers which will cost the companies more money because they need to hire more people to do the same work which supposed to be done in five-day work.
Secondly, the author insists that working fewer days would lead to more productivity since the workers would have enough time to rest. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes that by saying that by mentioning that the employees would need to work extra time to make up the day they do not work which causes them to be exhausted so, they would so tired.
Finally, the writer argues that the four-day workweek is good for employees to spend enough time with their families, on the other hand, the lecturer asserts that the free time would be worse since people would be worried about their jobs and they would think that may be they lose their careers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'tire'
Suggestion: tire
... them to be exhausted so, they would so tired. Finally, the writer argues that the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...ut their jobs and they would think that may be they lose their careers.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79838709677 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22475430953 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4149854413 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.75 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.125 7.06452816374 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224875095171 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126659410249 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781968004682 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159277447524 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743404674055 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.