The reading states that an amateur sketch has come up for sale and some people believe that this is a portrait of Jane Austen and the reading provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the evidence is not convincing as the portrait came from an extended family of Hane Austen and he refutes the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that Austen's family recognized it as a portrait of the author. But, the professor refutes the reason stating that Austin died 70 years earlier before the portrait came out. As a result, no one from the family saw her. So, they can not tell whether that portrait is her or not.
Second, the face in the portrait clearly resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch, which we knows depicts Austen. But, the professor contends that Austen's family was very wealthy and had an extended family. He also states that the portrait might be others or others teenage from the same family. He thinks that the picture is one of her cousins.
Third, the reading avers that the painting is not signed, not dated but there is evidence that it was painted when Austen was a teenager as the style is similar to Ozias Humphrey. But, the lecturer refutes this point stating that it only matches with the style and nothing else. He also states that the man who sold the canvas, William, started selling when he was 27, but at that time Austen already passed her teenage life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'know'
Suggestion: know
... the one in Cassandras sketch, which we knows depicts Austen. But, the professor cont...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.712 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17109741836 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1817119252 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6153846154 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.