The article states that the large cane toad population is threatening small native animals of Australia and proposes some measures to stop the spread of the cane toad in the continent. On the other hand, the professor contends that it's not that easy to get rid of cane toads, furthermore, she believes the ways, which passage tells them, won't be successful and also will damage the environment.
To commence with, the passage avers that one way to prevent the spread of the toads would be to build a national fence. The lecture opposes this strategy by declaring that, with this method, we can't stop this spread. She mentions there are many reversing streams in the region, which will carry young toads or even their eggs, inside the fence. Also, the fence won't be able to stop this kind of transportation and this method is unlikely to be effective.
Second, the reading asserts that the toads could be captured and destroyed by some volunteers. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this method by saying that we will be able to stop the spread with the help of volunteers but, inadvertently, they will destroy some of the Australian native frogs because it is hard to distinguish frogs from toads especially when they are young.
At last, the passage contends that the final way is to develop a disease-causing virus to control the cane toad populations. Nonetheless, the lecture opposes this way by stating that this strategy will have terrible consequences since the virus will destroy the toads' habitats in America. She claims that it is possible due to the many toads' transportations which occur between these two continents. Once, the virus reaches America it will devastate its toad’s habitats and it is a disaster since the cane toad is a vital part of America's ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...by declaring that, with this method, we cant stop this spread. She mentions there ar...
^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s but, inadvertently, they will destroy some of the Australian native frogs because it is h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98338870432 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74243184784 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521594684385 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8244961787 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.