Both the reading and the listening passage talk about the Torreya taxifolia; a plant found in Florida, which is going to be extinct. While the reading passage states three possible options to address this extinction, the professor disputes the claims made in the article that they are not satisfactory solutions.
First of all, according to the reading passage, this plant can be re-established in the same location, where all the environment and the climate are the same; microclimate. This argument is challenged by the professor. She asserts that due to global warming that area is going to warm, which is not a favor for this plant. In addition, Florida is drained day by day and is becoming dry. As a result, this plant could not survive in such a condition.
Second, the author suggests assisted migration; the seeds and the sampling are spread widely in the northern region, where the temperature is suitable for this plant. However, the professor argues that the relocated place is full of a species of tree called the Black Locust tree, which spreads out very quickly and kills other endangered plants. Consequently, relocation will give unpredicted outcomes.
Third, the author contends that this endangered plant can be preserved in the research center under the favorable condition of the laboratory. This will be beneficial for things; to conduct research and protect this plant. In contrast, the professor's stance is that in the laboratory condition, the plant could not resist diseases. In this regard, the laboratory should be robust enough for the area, where genetically diverse and relatively large population plants can be planted. This will be practically impossible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...nd protect this plant. In contrast, the professors stance is that in the laboratory condit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22058823529 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79000277499 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0969726298 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0171158348854 0.272083759551 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00680933828576 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025478210896 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0159282198357 0.162205337803 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275884860296 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.