The article states that an archaeologist proposed that ancient clay jars and copper cylinders inside them were ancient electric batteries and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that argument in article is not convincing and refute each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that if the vessels were used as batteries,they would probably have been attached to some electricity conductors. The professor refutes this point by saying that this vessels discovered by local people. She states that this people could thrown away that conductors or assumed that they were useless.
Second, the article posits that the copper cylinders exactly like copper cylinders discovered in a nearby site. However, the professor says that it is correct that the vessels are very similar but it doesn't prove anything. According to the professor, at first this cylinders used for original purpose like what the article says but after that they may be used for another use such as electrical batteries.
Third, the article says that ancient people couldn't do anything with electricity and it was useless for them because they had no devices that replied on electricity. The professor opposes this point by explaining that the ancient people could electricity for many purposes. We also learn that the ancient people could use electricity for example for shocking or for magic convincing and even for healing means. They could use batteries for medical purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...at if the vessels were used as batteries,they would probably have been attached to so...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...essor refutes this point by saying that this vessels discovered by local people. She...
^^^^
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...overed by local people. She states that this people could thrown away that conductor...
^^^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have thrown' or 'throw'?
Suggestion: have thrown; throw
...ople. She states that this people could thrown away that conductors or assumed that th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hat the vessels are very similar but it doesnt prove anything. According to the profes...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g. According to the professor, at first this cylinders used for original purpose lik...
^^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...d, the article says that ancient people couldnt do anything with electricity and it was...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33191489362 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57478809335 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557446808511 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6485944846 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.416666667 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446228180867 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164198503671 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983179418587 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262403567678 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259833431324 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.