Consodering nowdays state of firms and their limitation in time and working employees, I think in today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes for two reasons.
First, there are small limited time to do work tasks. lots of firms have limitations in their budget and so they hire as less employees as they can and at other hand they have lots of projects to do. According to firms limitation in time, this small crew of employees have to do more works in their working hours. By considering this fact, it is more reasonable for employees to work quickly and risk making mistakes instead of not finishing the work at due time. And firms prefer to hire and maintain employees which work more quickly and present their given tasks at arranged time.
Second, there are always opportunities for covering mistakes. For example in lots of firms there are a special commission that cover and revise finished tasks that been proposed by other parts of firm. The time this commission consume for revising tasks is also calculated before as the project defined at the first place. So by using this mechanism of correcting mistakes there will be small chance for lateness in providing a strong appropriate work. Also by finishing the given task at earlier time than due time, employee has this opportunity to revise his mistakes and cover them as much possible as it can be.
Although there are always some faults in working quickly but in today's world, employees have to accustomed to do their tasks on a very compressed schedule to obtain enough time to correct and revise their task after they first finished it . Moreover, there is a special part in lots of firms that also revise their task for at least first time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lots
...re small limited time to do work tasks. lots of firms have limitations in their budg...
^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun employees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ons in their budget and so they hire as less employees as they can and at other hand...
^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'firm'.
Suggestion: firm
...ve lots of projects to do. According to firms limitation in time, this small crew of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...in providing a strong appropriate work. Also by finishing the given task at earlier ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... their task after they first finished it . Moreover, there is a special part in lo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, second, so, at least, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77814569536 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43855755994 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46357615894 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 439.2 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4238099638 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210036571225 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988568088957 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886009628349 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16788295093 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799514421206 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.