The reading and the lecturer are both about the strange sound that was detected by submariners called Quakers that comes from under water. The author of the reading provides three possible reasons for the causes of the sound. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She refutes each and every argument made in the article by providing supporting details.
First and foremost, the author points out that the Quakers are coming from the male and female Orcas. It is mentioned that these Orcas makes these strange sound to get the attention of its counter-parts in times of mating. The lecturer is challenged by this point. She says that this Orca theory is plausible since Orcas live on the surface of the water and the submarines are deep under the ocean. Furthermore, she argues that the sonar could have detected these sounds if it occurred under the ocean.
In addition to that, the sound comes from the enormous squid that came into close contact with the submarines. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She says that Russian submariners detected the sound in 1960 and the sound lasted for 20 years. After that period, there was trace of such sound for a decade. Hence, the lecturer, there is no valid reason why the sound stopped and started again since squid has been living in the area all the time.
Last but not least, the author states that the Quakers might be from a submarine that wants to spy on the other submarines. The article establishes that these spy submarines might have used technology that cannot detect their submarine presence. The lecturer, on the other hand posits that it is impossible for a spy submarine to move away that quickly. She puts forth the idea that there is no technology that can produce engine that silently and with fastness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...le reasons for the causes of the sound. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81877022654 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31012657347 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6568019561 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7222222222 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325631406212 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961195567013 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741542012854 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195905636982 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310842026014 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.