TOP 47.
Pterosaurs reptile powered flight ability
The article states that Pterosaurus whis is a reptile with tall wings did not have capability to flying by using flapping of wing and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor assert that this type of reptile has capability of powered flight and refutes each of authors reasons.
First, the reading claims that pterosaaurs similar to modern reptile were probably cold-blooded with slow metabolism which could nit provides abundant needed energy for poweflight. The professor oposes this point by declaing that there are some fossil remains of this ancient reptile with demonstrate dense furry coverage on body of this reptiles which shows this reptile could be warm-blooded and probably have ability of high metabolism to provide powered flight energy.
Second, the article states that the weight of this animal is one of this reptile limiting factor for flight. In contrast, the lecturer says that this animal have bones with hollow structure which can reduce the weight and this reptile could be capable to powered flight by reducing weight.
Third, the author posit that powered flight need ability to take off similar to birds, and this reptile have not has such powerfull muscle to take off. The lecturer casts doubt on this claim by saying that there are evidence that this reptile has four poweful limb for fast take of and jump and this bird not have two back limb similar to modern birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nstrate dense furry coverage on body of this reptiles which shows this reptile could...
^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'limb' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'limbs'.
Suggestion: limbs
...ence that this reptile has four poweful limb for fast take of and jump and this bird...
^^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'limb' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'limbs'.
Suggestion: limbs
...nd jump and this bird not have two back limb similar to modern birds.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05982905983 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2719453559 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1530200468 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212645859104 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11711751545 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668904810241 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147744086023 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128561634125 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.