Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b

The speaker argues that the memoir of Chevalier is reliable and accurate. This calls in question the reading, which states that his memoir is an amusing, distorted version of reality.
According to the speaker, borrowing loans does not imply that Chevalier was not wealthy as stated in the memoir. It could be the case that he had assets of high worth that need to be sold to get liquid money, and so had to temporarily borrow money for is partying and gambling habits. This is against the reading which claims that, a rich person that Chaveliar was would not need to loan money.
Also, from the lecture we know, that Chavelier use to write notes about the conversations he had with Voltaire on daily basis. That he used these notes later, when he was writing his memoir, is also supported by evidence. Whereas, the critics make a case againt these conversations, as they belive that Chevalier cannot possibly remember the exact conversation he had with Voltaire after many years. They donot mention of any note taking.
Finally, the speaker contends that Chevalier did escape the prison by making a hole in the ceiling with help of a metal shard. Many of the people who were incarcerated with him in the Venecian prison, were infact more powerful than him. There is no record of their escape. If Chevalier did escape by bribing jailers, then these more potent prisoners could also have easily escaped prison. The speaker also says that there is a document which states that after Chevalier left prison the ceiling of his prison room was repaired. From this she infers that he did really flee prison just as he mentioned it in his memoir. On the contrary, critics blame Chevalier of bribing jail officers with the help of his poltical friends.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...rom the lecture we know, that Chavelier use to write notes about the conversations ...
^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'finally', 'if', 'really', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'on the contrary']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233532934132 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.191616766467 0.158904122519 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0449101796407 0.0723426182421 62% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0568862275449 0.0435111971325 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.062874251497 0.0277247811725 227% => OK
Prepositions: 0.149700598802 0.128828473217 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0419161676647 0.0370669169778 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.37419065821 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0179640718563 0.0208969081088 86% => OK
Particles: 0.00299401197605 0.00154638098197 194% => OK
Determiners: 0.101796407186 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0119760479042 0.0158828679856 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0179640718563 0.0114777025283 157% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1743.0 1645.83664459 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77152317881 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347682119205 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.235099337748 0.287516216867 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.152317880795 0.187439937562 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0794701986755 0.113142543107 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37419065821 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 60.1431454793 53.8517498576 112% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.875 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3132328236 49.3711431718 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 132.220823453 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 21.7502111507 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.878197800319 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 42.3849337748 50.5018328374 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.36538461538 1.90840788429 72% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3106934491 0.549887131256 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106514701393 0.142949733639 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0566901060426 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.538522592141 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174958439225 0.139662658121 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132069058742 0.266732575781 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073580443795 0.103435571967 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.310750018156 0.414875509568 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0279120875443 0.0530846634433 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225283892931 0.40443939384 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542040627569 0.0528353158467 103% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.