Both The reading passage and the lecture explore the issue of four-day work. the passage indicate that it is beneficial for companies and individuals. However, the professor points out some negative effects of it.
First, employing four-day workers will elevate the costs. According to the professor, to employ A four-day worker, companies have to employ more employees, which requires more expenditure on training, office equipment and others. This directly contradicts the counterpart in the reading passage.
Second, it will increase the individual workload and reduce the rate of employment. The passage says that four-day employee enjoy less workload. Besides, To accomplish equal workload, companies will have to employ more workers. However, the professor disagree with these points. Companies would like to compel employees to attain the same workload that should be done by five-day employees, which not only poses more workload to four-day workers, but also constrains/prohibits the increase of employment rate. This was another part where the professor contradicted the passage.
Finally, it will decrease the life quality of four-day workers and create the potential risk of unemployment to them. Reduced work days typically means lower compensation. Worse yet, in an economic crisis, four-day workers companies tend to be dismissed from companies, because companies prefer five-day workers. Four-day workers would have a weakness of life quality and career prospects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ure explore the issue of four-day work. the passage indicate that it is beneficial ...
^^^
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'indicates'.
Suggestion: indicates
...the issue of four-day work. the passage indicate that it is beneficial for companies and...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285714285714 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.134920634921 0.158904122519 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0952380952381 0.0723426182421 132% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0396825396825 0.0435111971325 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0198412698413 0.0277247811725 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0714285714286 0.128828473217 55% => OK
Participles: 0.0198412698413 0.0370669169778 54% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89398064384 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0396825396825 0.0208969081088 190% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00396825396825 0.00154638098197 257% => OK
Determiners: 0.111111111111 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0277777777778 0.0158828679856 175% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015873015873 0.0114777025283 138% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1486.0 1645.83664459 90% => OK
No of words: 220.0 271.125827815 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.75454545455 6.08160592843 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.486363636364 0.374372842146 130% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.422727272727 0.287516216867 147% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.318181818182 0.187439937562 170% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.168181818182 0.113142543107 149% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89398064384 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.539623497131 111% => OK
Word variations: 59.6055579102 53.8517498576 111% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.75 21.7502111507 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1207790357 49.3711431718 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.875 132.220823453 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 21.7502111507 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5625 0.878197800319 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 56.0227272727 50.5018328374 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.9387755102 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.558556790696 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0602156103028 0.142949733639 42% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0475811289243 0.0787303798458 60% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520193665907 0.631733273073 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156973592359 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214818828474 0.266732575781 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974962146772 0.103435571967 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383683606613 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0764789401774 0.0530846634433 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.388360723568 0.40443939384 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553270334251 0.0528353158467 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.