Both The reading passage and the lecture explore the issue of four-day work. the passage indicate that it is beneficial for companies and individuals. However, the professor points out some negative effects of it.
First, employing four-day workers will elevate the costs. According to the professor, to employ A four-day worker, companies have to employ more employees, which requires more expenditure on training, office equipment and others. This directly contradicts the counterpart in the reading passage.
Second, it will increase the individual workload and reduce the rate of employment. The passage says that four-day employee enjoy less workload. Besides, To accomplish equal workload, companies will have to employ more workers. However, the professor disagree with these points. Companies would like to compel employees to attain the same workload that should be done by five-day employees, which not only poses more workload to four-day workers, but also constrains/prohibits the increase of employment rate. This was another part where the professor contradicted the passage.
Finally, it will decrease the life quality of four-day workers and create the potential risk of unemployment to them. Reduced work days typically means lower compensation. Worse yet, in an economic crisis, four-day workers companies tend to be dismissed from companies, because companies prefer five-day workers. Four-day workers would have a weakness of life quality and career prospects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and affects the companys performance. Third, the reading claims that implement...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'as a result', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259689922481 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0968992248062 0.0723426182421 134% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0271317829457 0.0435111971325 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0193798449612 0.0277247811725 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127906976744 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.062015503876 0.0370669169778 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57921199554 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0116279069767 0.0208969081088 56% => OK
Particles: 0.0077519379845 0.00154638098197 501% => OK
Determiners: 0.12015503876 0.128158765124 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0348837209302 0.0158828679856 220% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0077519379845 0.0114777025283 68% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1519.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 239.0 271.125827815 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.35564853556 6.08160592843 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.422594142259 0.374372842146 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.334728033473 0.287516216867 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209205020921 0.187439937562 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138075313808 0.113142543107 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57921199554 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569037656904 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 55.8882550514 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 26.5555555556 21.7502111507 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.679639207 49.3711431718 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.777777778 132.220823453 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 21.7502111507 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.11111111111 0.878197800319 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 60.0283589028 50.5018328374 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.10909090909 1.90840788429 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.654548397082 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12628740014 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0563610209779 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.67863866478 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149584956207 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.306984954573 0.266732575781 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13655500703 0.103435571967 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.28268603041 0.414875509568 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0309199514736 0.0530846634433 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.421092518992 0.40443939384 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116483361146 0.0528353158467 220% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.