Lecturer casts doubt on the idea that four day workweek has benefits both on employees, company and economy. Points made in the passage that four day workweek will benefit company, economy, and employees refuted by the points made by lecturer.
According to the passage working less is beneficial to employees despite having less salaries it creates more time to relax and spend with their family. By contrast the lecturer argues that working fewer days will affect them negatively in reality. Four day workers are in danger of reduced job stability and career advancement. When economic downturn happens four day workers are most likely to lose their jobs and get passed their promotions since companies prefer long time workers who work for longer time with continuous coverage the lecturer argues.
Furthermore, passage indicates that companies will have increased profit with happier and more efficient workers. This can also affect the country's economy when companies hire more staff decreasing unemployment. On the other hand, lecturer points out that working four days will not affect companies positively, rather negatively because it will cost companies much more by training new workers, paying for their medical insurances, buying new computers and making extra rooms. As a result, the company suffers much more loss than letting all workers work full time. However, they can rise expectation by expecting four day workers to do the five day work in four days. Which reduces unnecessary use of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun salaries is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... beneficial to employees despite having less salaries it creates more time to relax ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...more loss than letting all workers work full time. However, they can rise expectation by...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s to do the five day work in four days. Which reduces unnecessary use of money. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40833333333 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47788832588 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608333333333 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6476618584 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35385394802 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125924847561 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521160214341 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239254244298 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371591098462 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.