According to the lecture, the idea of a four-day workweek is not efficient and beneficial for the company as well the employee. The author of the passage, however, disagrees with this belief. Instead, he/she believes that it will not only improve the economy of the company but also the company and the employee's productivity as a whole.
First, the passage claims that employees who choose to work four days a week will have more free time, which improves their quality of life and hence they feel more rested and makes less costly errors in their works. This concept is refuted by the lecturer who asserts that employees who work four days a week are more likely to have less job stability which will ultimately reduce their quality of life. Also, the lecturer suggests that these employees lose their job first during economic turndown and have less chance of advancement in their position as the company would rather advance the employees who are more committed and work five days a week.
Another key point the passage states is that the company makes more profit as they have to pay 80% of the normal wage to their employers who want to work a four-day week and they can hire more employees to accomplish same work and pay wage. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this idea and suggests that hiring new employees will add additional cost for the training of employees, office space and medical benefits. Also, they have to bear the same cost of health benefit for both four-day a week employees and five-days a week employee. Evidently, the lecturer thinks this will not profit the company and increase the additional cost only.
In conclusion, the lecturer and the author appear to be in disagreement about the idea of a four-day week policy for the employees in a company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...he company but also the company and the employees productivity as a whole. First, the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81553398058 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39246801127 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466019417476 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7762649837 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 110.228320801 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0909090909 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.538873573376 0.272083759551 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209785739599 0.0996497079465 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959763065776 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315758974266 0.162205337803 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852641256562 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.