The lecturer cast doubts on the reading passages claim that workers able to choose between five day week and a four day week will benefit both the company and individuals. The lecturer states that this policy will have no positive effect on the company.
First of all, unlike how the reading passage claims that this policy will benefit the company economically with having more quality workers, the lecturer argues that this will actually force companies to pay more. Companies will have to pay more for training process, health insurance, additional office space, and computers.
Second, the lecturer refutes the reading passage statement that unemployment rate will fall with this policy. He claims that this policy will not enlarge job openings because companies will not choose a path that will cost more. Companies will rather start to find different options such as making their workers do overwork and pay the extra money. To make matters worse, companies might actually expect more from their employees to work as much as they would work five days during the four day period.
Finally, while the lecturer agrees that individuals will have more free time available he argues that this does not lead to increased quality of life. He poses that this policy carries a risk. Employees that chooses a four day schedule will have unstable positions because they might be first in line when the company needs to fire some people. Also, people who work five days will have a higher chance of being promoted which leaves the four days employees with low salary positions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...workers able to choose between five day week and a four day week will benefit both t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, if, second, so, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05363984674 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23519794724 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2380818167 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.916666667 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348058127746 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129257611905 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968574144705 0.0662205650399 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213260899294 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814877016461 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.