The reading and lecture are about the effects of offering four working days week to employees. The author of the reading states that offering four day week will benefit everyone and lists three reasons for that. Professor opposes this claim by refuting all of the claims made in reading.
Firstly the author says that offering four work day weeks will increase company profits as the employees willing to opt for it will take a pay cut and they can hire more employees for the same cost. Professor rebuts this claim saying companies have to spend more to hire new employees. He reasons that hiring costs, health benefits, workspace, infrastructure will eat into companies profits.
Secondly, the author reasons that people opting for four day week will lead to less unemployment as companies will hire more employees to do the work of the employees who opted for four day week. Professor refutes this by stating that employees opt for four day week doesn't mean companies hire new employees. He states that in fact, companies might ask other employees to do overtime to cover the work of employees who opted for four day week thus affecting their work-life balance or might expect employees to complete five days work in four days leading to pressurized situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...ut the effects of offering four working days week to employees. The author of the re...
^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...e reading states that offering four day week will benefit everyone and lists three r...
^^^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...rofessor opposes this claim by refuting all of the claims made in reading. Firstly the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...reasons that people opting for four day week will lead to less unemployment as compa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...of the employees who opted for four day week. Professor refutes this by stating that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...stating that employees opt for four day week doesnt mean companies hire new employee...
^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ng that employees opt for four day week doesnt mean companies hire new employees. He s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...ork of employees who opted for four day week thus affecting their work-life balance ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96713615023 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45517912102 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1717236322 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432464996108 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204561110934 0.0996497079465 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134632329032 0.0662205650399 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302432745634 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10857142068 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.